You asked for a request channel and for the channels to be consolidated. This is the whole plan — what opens, what merges, what closes, and what the process is from Monday. Nothing here deletes a conversation, and nothing moves without a week's notice to the people in it.
Counted this morning, not estimated.
The count is the symptom, not the problem. The problem is that roughly ten of those channels are all places where somebody can ask for work — and none of them says it isn't. So the same kind of request lands in a different place depending on who is asking and what they remember, and the only person holding the full picture is whoever happens to read all ten.
Two of them have already gone quiet on their own: one has had nothing since 4 June, another nothing since 1 July. Nobody closed them, so they still show up in everyone's sidebar and still look like valid places to post.
If a channel can't finish the sentence "this is where we ___", it doesn't survive the pass. That single test is what takes 28 down to 11 — and it's also what stops it climbing back to 28 by Christmas, because the same test applies to the next new channel anyone proposes.
Eleven channels, each with one job. Everything else folds into one of them.
Closing a channel in Slack is not deleting it. Every message, file and link stays searchable forever — it just stops appearing in the sidebar and stops accepting new posts. Anyone can still find an old thread by searching for it exactly the way they do now.
Before any channel closes it gets a final post saying where the conversation moved to, so somebody landing on it from an old link knows where to go. And there's a week between the announcement and the closing, so if a channel turns out to matter to someone, it stays.
This is the part that has to be true for the rest of it to hold.
In #requests, in your own words, with whatever you'd normally attach. No form, no template, no ticket number.
The request and everything attached to it is logged the moment it's posted, so it doesn't depend on anyone happening to be watching the channel that day.
Confirmed in the same thread when it's done — not in a different channel, not in a direct message you have to go find.
The reason for a single channel isn't tidiness. It's that one channel can be watched properly and ten cannot. Everything that came in through one of the ten yesterday still landed, but it landed because someone read all ten. That doesn't survive a busy week, a holiday, or a second person joining.
Four steps over ten days. Nothing closes in the first week.
Created, everyone added, and the one-line instruction pinned at the top so nobody has to ask how to use it.
One post in #all-anc saying #requests is the way to ask for something from now on. Coming from you is what makes it stick — coming from me it reads as a suggestion.
#crm and #creative consolidate. Each channel being folded in gets a final post pointing at its new home. Members are carried across, so nobody has to join anything.
The twelve on the close list go read-only, a week after everyone was told. History stays searchable.
Anything nobody missed stays closed. Anything somebody did miss comes back, no argument. Then the rule from section 02 applies to every new channel anyone proposes.
One post in #all-anc on Friday. A process change announced by the person who does the work is a preference; announced by you it's how we work. That single post is the difference between this holding and drifting back in a month.
This plan covers the 28 channels I can see. The wider ANC Slack has its own list that I don't have visibility into, and it will have the same duplication in it. Send me that list — or point me at it — and it gets the same treatment in the same week, so we end up with one clean structure rather than a tidy half.